Pink Floyd - We Don't Need No Education Lyrics In Description!
LINK >>>>> https://bytlly.com/2tkd1r
Third, the whole song is a rebellion against the school, and when \"Another Brick In the Wall\" plays in The Wall film, Pink has a day dream of the children chanting \"we don't need no education\", destroying the school building with sledgehammers and crowbars, setting it on fire, and dragging the teachers out kicking and screaming. To me, this doesn't say \"we need education\" or \"we need a different type of education\", it says \"we don't need education at all\". I don't know if the call for alternative education is even something a kid of that age would think of; school is the way that it is and Pink hates it.
Maybe it's just omitted punctuation in the lyrics readable form (we don't need, no, education / we don't need -no!- thought control), as emphasazing the negative statement. That also makes sense rhythmically
The tag line of the song is the clearly grammatically incorrect double negative \"We don't need no education\" Floyd are all highly educated OxBridge graduates and the implication there would be that we need MORE and BETTER education generally. The song is a mish mash of ideas I feel held together by the solo and then tied into the context of a concept album. The idea of a barrier between them and their growing audience of pissheads as Waters saw them and even being spat at by an audience member is a reflection of behaviour that Floyd who are quite frankly a bit posh and snobby would see as beneath them. The implication that the wall had nothing to do with the Berlin wall and is just a metaphor is nonsense as Waters is highly politically motivated. \"Hey you WHITE HOUSE, ha ha charade you are\" are the lyrics on the current tour. Also Gilmour released his first solo album in 1978 due to growing discontent at his songs being overshadowed by Waters and the pair has infamous fights over 'the wall' more than any other album, Waters left after 1983's AWFUL \"The final cut\" which is really his first solo album effectively handing the band over to Gilmour. There was clear division there too.
We don''t need no educationWe don't need no thought controlNo dark sarcasm in the classroomTeachers leave them kids aloneHey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone!All in all it's just another brick in the wall.All in all you're just another brick in the wall.We don't need no educationWe don't need no thought controlNo dark sarcasm in the classroomTeachers leave them kids aloneWhat these words are really saying that we don't need outside advice, we already know everything, so, leave us alone.
Life imitated art in early 1980 when South African school children, fed up with an inferior apartheid-era education system, took to chanting the lyrics of Pink Floyd's \"Another Brick in the Wall (Part II).\" The song, with a memorable line stating \"We don't need no education,\" had held the top spot on the local charts for almost three months, a total of seven weeks longer than it did in America.
\"When the school children are all chanting 'We don't need no education' together in unison, this act, in a way, is MORE conforming than the education they have grown to hate. If you think about it, Roger Waters was saying that even in a revolt against conformity there will still be the presence of conformists, or uniformed followers. The use of the helpless school children is magnificent and proves my point even more. These kids do what they are told! I mean, I read somewhere that Roger got the idea to use a group of kids one day and then BANG, the next day he asked a school if he could come in and BANG, they all agreed and within a short period of time, the entire chorus of children was recorded. No questions asked. Nobody raised a fuss or anything, even the teachers in the school were excited and caught up in the moment without fully understanding what was going on. My point is this: Roger Waters wanted to show how conformity is ever-present, even when we're little, and even when we are rebelling. His point is definitely powerful.\" - Brad Kaye
However, Waters paints a bleak, but accurate image of the education system in his lyrics; he explains that education revolved around a set of rigid ideas to which all students were expected to conform and teachers were meant to enforce. Just like Roger Waters and his generation, we are being taught to put our heads down and color inside the lines. But what we truly need is for education to encourage free thinking and critical thought, releasing students and teachers from the confines of the curriculum.
this song is a critism to the education system in UK on that time i think.the lyrics \"we don't need no education\" got grammatical error to show that the education system on that time are horrible..teacher don't allow students to do this and that and blocked their creativity..my english is hoorible too but it is ok since the readers understand..peace :)
I think it's pretty obvious but, the \"wall\" as a whole and not just the particular lyrics of this song are the things keeping pink from being able to live a normal sane life. The education system, and strict teachers (walls) are just a couple of the things oppressing pink into his alienation and separation from the world
What \"student\" does not love this song, whether they be college or school aged sponges soaking up every ounce, every morsel of knowledge Not even just that. \"Hey, teacher, leave those kids alone\" taps into a common well that we all have experienced at some point in our studious rebellion whether a hellion or pet....the meaning is impervious to that \"sentiment\" drilling much deeper into the core curriculum. I have always heard, \"we don't need no forced control\" as opposed to \"thought control\" which is why this song is amazing because both the implied and actual inferences drive the same meaning....what more penetrating and effective than forced thought control via \"education.\" I will refrain from going into a liberal bashing rant but when you learn about Christopher Columbus and slavery for eons disregarding the Holocaust and such, it is quite obvious that George Bernard Shaw has made his mark....carefully select the environment in which the seedling must thrive and you will have effectively grown what you intended to sow. Brick by brick you are able to build an impenetrable wall if and only if all of the bricks are identical and uniform for no one brick with flaws can formulate the whole as the subtle weaknesses could potentially cause the whole structure to crumble (fall) and I will not even go into the obvious \"Berlinn Wall.\" \"No dark sarcasm in the class room\" (need not even speak of the subliminal ways they so handily contrive this phrase for those of us who hear something in a multitude of ways such as the guards have come to sac the castle...luv, luv!) Illustrates the subversive meaning. Again, without a political conjecture, it means what it means... Slide remarks about political slant from teachers also taught the jargon no.doubt force their thoughts upon the unwitting and innocent youth so the question is...who is teaching who The trickle down effect of knowledge.Teachers are taught how to teach and therefore teach what they have learned building the minds of tomorrow....brick by brick, laying the foundation of the next generation of dutiful servants and uniform constructs to.the societal whole. Fuck an A++! These guyzzz! 100% scored this score!
Perhaps it was this perception of the song as relatively meaningless fun that caused it to pass unnoticed by the media. Not so the other best known anti-school rock song, \"Another Brick in The Wall (Part 2),\" a hit for PinkFloyd in 1979. By this time, the context had changed considerably from when \"School's Out\" was recorded and schooling had just been placed at the centre of a national political debate where it still remains seventeen years on. A Conservative government with a New Right agenda for education had just been elected and the teacher unions were engaged in industrial action (Johnson 1991). One of the record's novelties was its use of children from St Winifred's School choir to sing in a Cockney accent the memorable hook, '\"We don't need no education,\" the final word sounding like \"edukashun.\" If that were not enough to confirm the worst suspicions of those who thought educational standards had never been lower, the hook used a double negative and teachers were exhorted to \"leave them kids alone.\" This, its ungrammatical construction aside, was little more than child centred educators like A. S. Neill had been saying for years. Similarly, the sentiment, \"We don't need no thought control\" was not all that far away from what contemporary theorists like Althusser were saying about schooling under capitalism. The appeal for \"No dark sarcasm in the classroom\" was mild compared to Lennon's representation of teacher behaviour and resonates more with Chuck Berry's \"mean\" looking teacher. In the song's chorus, 59ce067264